The Cosmic Horseshoe - Unraveling the Universe's Biggest Black Hole
SpaceTime: Astronomy & Science NewsAugust 18, 2025x
99
00:24:4122.65 MB

The Cosmic Horseshoe - Unraveling the Universe's Biggest Black Hole

In this episode of SpaceTime, we uncover the latest astronomical marvels and pressing concerns in space science.
The Cosmic Horseshoe: A Supermassive Discovery
Astronomers have potentially identified the most massive supermassive black hole ever discovered, dubbed the Cosmic Horseshoe, which is estimated to be around 36 billion times the mass of our Sun. Located approximately 5 billion light years away, this colossal black hole distorts space-time and creates a stunning Einstein ring effect by gravitationally lensing light from distant galaxies. The measurement of its mass combines gravitational lensing and stellar kinematics, providing a rare glimpse into the formation and evolution of galaxies and their central black holes.
Possible New Planet in the Alpha Centauri System
Exciting news emerges from the Alpha Centauri star system, where astronomers may have discovered a new planet orbiting Alpha Centauri A, the closest star system to our own at just 4.25 light years away. Using data from NASA's Webb Space Telescope, researchers suggest this Saturn-sized gas giant could be located in the habitable zone of a sun-like star. While the planet's gaseous nature may not support life, its proximity offers a unique opportunity to study planetary systems beyond our own, challenging existing theories on planet formation in binary star systems.
The Satellite Proliferation Dilemma
As the number of satellites in Earth orbit continues to rise, astronomers are sounding alarms over the interference these satellites cause to vital scientific research. A study has highlighted the impact of Starlink's megaconstellation on radio astronomy, with significant radio emissions masking faint signals from the universe. This growing concern emphasizes the need for regulatory measures to mitigate interference and protect the integrity of astronomical observations.
www.spacetimewithstuartgary.com
✍️ Episode References
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
https://academic.oup.com/mnras
Astrophysical Journal Letters
https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/2041-8205
Astronomy and Astrophysics Journal
https://www.aanda.org/
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/spacetime-space-astronomy--2458531/support.


00:00:00 --> 00:00:02 Stuart Gary: This is space time series 28 episode 99

00:00:02 --> 00:00:05 full broadcast on 18 August

00:00:05 --> 00:00:08 2025 coming up on SpaceTime,

00:00:08 --> 00:00:11 the most massive black hole ever discovered.

00:00:11 --> 00:00:14 The detection of what looks like another planet in the Alpha

00:00:14 --> 00:00:17 Centauri star system, and the growing

00:00:17 --> 00:00:20 concern among scientists about the ongoing

00:00:20 --> 00:00:22 proliferation of satellites in Earth orbit.

00:00:23 --> 00:00:25 All that and more coming up on, um, Space

00:00:25 --> 00:00:28 Time. Welcome to

00:00:28 --> 00:00:30 Space Time with Stuart Gary Gary.

00:00:46 --> 00:00:49 Astronomers have discovered what's potentially the biggest

00:00:49 --> 00:00:52 supermassive black hole ever seen, called

00:00:52 --> 00:00:55 the cosmic horseshoe, because it's so big, it's

00:00:55 --> 00:00:57 distorting space time. This behemoth's

00:00:57 --> 00:01:00 estimated to be around 36 billion times the

00:01:00 --> 00:01:03 mass of the sun. And that puts it close to the

00:01:03 --> 00:01:05 theoretical upper limit of what's possible.

00:01:06 --> 00:01:08 Located some 5 billion light years away,

00:01:08 --> 00:01:11 supermassive black hole warps and gravitationally

00:01:11 --> 00:01:14 lenses light from background galaxies, turning its

00:01:14 --> 00:01:17 appearance into that of a giant horseshoe shaped Einstein

00:01:17 --> 00:01:20 ring. A report in the Monthly Notices of the Royal

00:01:20 --> 00:01:23 Astronomical Society claims the monster is located in

00:01:23 --> 00:01:26 one of the most m massive galaxies ever observed.

00:01:26 --> 00:01:29 Astronomers believe that most, if not all galaxies

00:01:29 --> 00:01:32 contain supermassive black holes at their centers.

00:01:32 --> 00:01:35 And the bigger the galaxy, the bigger the black hole.

00:01:35 --> 00:01:38 One of the study's authors, Thomas Collett from the University

00:01:38 --> 00:01:41 of Portsmouth, says the cosmic horseshoe is among the 10

00:01:41 --> 00:01:44 most massive black holes ever discovered and quite

00:01:44 --> 00:01:47 possibly the biggest of all. The thing is,

00:01:47 --> 00:01:49 most of the other black hole mass measurements have been

00:01:49 --> 00:01:52 through indirect methods, and that means there's quite a bit

00:01:52 --> 00:01:55 of leeway for uncertainties. So

00:01:55 --> 00:01:58 astronomers don't really know for sure which is the

00:01:58 --> 00:02:01 biggest. However, Collette says they've got far

00:02:01 --> 00:02:03 more certainty with the mass of this black hole, thanks to the way

00:02:03 --> 00:02:06 it was measured. The authors detected the cosmic

00:02:06 --> 00:02:09 horseshoe black hole using a combination of gravitational

00:02:09 --> 00:02:12 lensing and stellar kimatics.

00:02:12 --> 00:02:15 Gravitational lensing involves the bending of light from

00:02:15 --> 00:02:17 background objects by the mass of a foreground

00:02:17 --> 00:02:20 object. Kinematics is the study of the

00:02:20 --> 00:02:23 motion of stars within galaxies and the speed and

00:02:23 --> 00:02:26 way they're moving around black holes. And the

00:02:26 --> 00:02:29 latter is seen as the gold standard for measuring black hole

00:02:29 --> 00:02:32 masses. But it doesn't really work outside the very

00:02:32 --> 00:02:34 nearby universe because galaxies appear too small in

00:02:34 --> 00:02:37 the sky to resolve the region a supermassive

00:02:37 --> 00:02:40 black hole lies. But adding gravitational

00:02:40 --> 00:02:43 lensing allowed the authors to push much further out into

00:02:43 --> 00:02:46 the universe. So they were able to detect the

00:02:46 --> 00:02:49 effect of the black hole in two ways. Firstly, by the way

00:02:49 --> 00:02:52 it's altering the path that light takes as it travels past

00:02:52 --> 00:02:54 the black hole, and secondly, the way it's causing

00:02:54 --> 00:02:57 stars in the Inner regions Of its host galaxy to move

00:02:57 --> 00:03:00 extremely quickly around the black hole, Often at

00:03:00 --> 00:03:03 speeds of greater than 400 kilometers per second.

00:03:03 --> 00:03:06 By combining these two measurements, astronomers could be

00:03:06 --> 00:03:09 completely confident that the black hole is real.

00:03:09 --> 00:03:12 This discovery was made for what's referred to as a

00:03:12 --> 00:03:15 dormant black hole. That's one that isn't actively accreting

00:03:15 --> 00:03:18 material at the time of its observation. So

00:03:18 --> 00:03:21 its detection relied purely on its immense

00:03:21 --> 00:03:24 gravitational pull and the effect it has on its

00:03:24 --> 00:03:26 surroundings. Uh, typically, for such a remote

00:03:26 --> 00:03:29 system, Black hole mass measurements are only possible when the

00:03:29 --> 00:03:32 black hole is active. The authors are describing the

00:03:32 --> 00:03:35 cosmic horseshoe system As a fossil group,

00:03:35 --> 00:03:37 Galaxy fossil groups at the end

00:03:37 --> 00:03:40 state of the most massive Gravitationally bound

00:03:40 --> 00:03:43 structures in the universe, Arising when they've

00:03:43 --> 00:03:46 collapsed down to a single extremely massive galaxy

00:03:46 --> 00:03:49 with no bright companions. Collette says

00:03:49 --> 00:03:52 it's now likely that all of the supermassive black

00:03:52 --> 00:03:55 holes that were originally the companion galaxies have

00:03:55 --> 00:03:57 now been merged to form this one single

00:03:57 --> 00:04:00 giant. So that means what we're really

00:04:00 --> 00:04:03 seeing here Is the end state of

00:04:03 --> 00:04:05 galaxy formation and the end

00:04:05 --> 00:04:07 state of black hole formation.

00:04:08 --> 00:04:11 This is space time. Still to

00:04:11 --> 00:04:14 come, astronomers discover what could be another

00:04:14 --> 00:04:17 planet Orbiting in the Alpha Centauri triple star system.

00:04:17 --> 00:04:20 And there's growing concern among scientists about the

00:04:20 --> 00:04:23 ongoing proliferation of satellites in Earth orbit.

00:04:23 --> 00:04:26 All that and more still to come, uh, on space

00:04:26 --> 00:04:26 time,

00:04:42 --> 00:04:44 astronomers may have discovered another planet

00:04:44 --> 00:04:47 Orbiting the Alpha Centauri triple star system.

00:04:48 --> 00:04:51 At a distance of just 4.25 light years,

00:04:51 --> 00:04:53 Alpha Centauri is the nearest star system to our

00:04:53 --> 00:04:56 own solar system. The system is located in

00:04:56 --> 00:04:59 the southern skies. It's the second of the two

00:04:59 --> 00:05:02 pointer stars Showing the way to the Southern cross.

00:05:03 --> 00:05:05 The system comprises two sun like stars,

00:05:05 --> 00:05:08 Alpha Centauri A and B, which orbit each other.

00:05:08 --> 00:05:11 Alpha Centauri A is fractionally larger Than our Sun,

00:05:11 --> 00:05:14 Alpha Centauri B, just a little bit smaller.

00:05:14 --> 00:05:17 And both are orbited by the system's third star, the

00:05:17 --> 00:05:20 red dwarf Proxima Centauri, which right now

00:05:20 --> 00:05:23 is the nearest star to the sun, consequently the second

00:05:23 --> 00:05:26 nearest star to Earth after the Sun. And astronomers

00:05:26 --> 00:05:29 have already confirmed three planets Orbiting Proxima

00:05:29 --> 00:05:32 Centauri. But the search for possible worlds Orbiting

00:05:32 --> 00:05:34 Alpha Centauri A and B has proven to be far more

00:05:34 --> 00:05:37 challenging. Now, a report in the

00:05:37 --> 00:05:40 Astrophysical Journal Letters has used observations

00:05:40 --> 00:05:42 from NASA's Webb Space Telescope's mid infrared

00:05:42 --> 00:05:45 instrument to suggest that a Saturn sized gas

00:05:45 --> 00:05:48 giant is orbiting Alpha Centauri A.

00:05:48 --> 00:05:51 Alpha Centauri A is the third brightest star system in the

00:05:51 --> 00:05:54 night sky. Now, if confirmed, it would

00:05:54 --> 00:05:57 make this planet the closest to Earth orbiting the

00:05:57 --> 00:06:00 habitable zone of a sun like star. Uh,

00:06:00 --> 00:06:02 studies lead author Charles Beckman from NASA's Jet

00:06:02 --> 00:06:05 Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, California, says

00:06:05 --> 00:06:08 that because this exoplanetary candidate is a gas

00:06:08 --> 00:06:11 giant, it's not likely to support life as we know it.

00:06:11 --> 00:06:14 But Beckman says with the system being so close,

00:06:14 --> 00:06:17 any exoplanets found there would offer a great

00:06:17 --> 00:06:19 opportunity to collect data on planetary systems other

00:06:19 --> 00:06:22 than our, um, own. Yet these are incredibly

00:06:22 --> 00:06:25 challenging observations to make, even with the world's

00:06:25 --> 00:06:28 most powerful space telescopes. That's because

00:06:28 --> 00:06:31 they're orbiting stars that are really bright and close and

00:06:31 --> 00:06:34 moving quickly across the sky. Webb

00:06:34 --> 00:06:36 was actually designed and optimized to find the most distant

00:06:36 --> 00:06:39 stars and galaxies in the universe. So the

00:06:39 --> 00:06:42 operations team at the Space Telescope Science Institute

00:06:42 --> 00:06:45 in Baltimore, Maryland, had to come up with a custom

00:06:45 --> 00:06:48 designed observation sequence just for this target.

00:06:48 --> 00:06:51 And it looks like this extra effort may well have paid off

00:06:51 --> 00:06:53 spectacularly. Several rounds of

00:06:53 --> 00:06:56 meticulously planned observations by Webb, careful

00:06:56 --> 00:06:59 analysis by astronomers and extensive computer

00:06:59 --> 00:07:02 modeling all combine to help determine that the

00:07:02 --> 00:07:05 source in the Webb image is likely to be a planet and not

00:07:05 --> 00:07:08 just a background object like a distant galaxy or a

00:07:08 --> 00:07:10 foreground object like a passing asteroid, or for that

00:07:10 --> 00:07:13 matter, some sort of detector or image artifact.

00:07:14 --> 00:07:17 The first observations of this planetary candidate actually

00:07:17 --> 00:07:20 took place back in August 2024, using

00:07:20 --> 00:07:23 the chronographic mask to block Alpha Centauri

00:07:23 --> 00:07:26 A's light. Still, the extra brightness

00:07:26 --> 00:07:28 from the nearby companion star Alpha Centauri B

00:07:28 --> 00:07:31 complicated the analysis. Nevertheless,

00:07:31 --> 00:07:34 Beckman and colleagues were able to subtract out the light from both the

00:07:34 --> 00:07:37 stars Alpha Centauri A and B to reveal an object

00:07:37 --> 00:07:40 over 10 times fainter than Alpha Centauri

00:07:40 --> 00:07:43 A, separated from the star by about two times

00:07:43 --> 00:07:45 the distance between the sun and the earth, about

00:07:45 --> 00:07:48 300 million kilometres. While the

00:07:48 --> 00:07:51 initial detection was exciting, the authors still needed

00:07:51 --> 00:07:53 more data in order to come to a firm conclusion.

00:07:54 --> 00:07:56 The trouble is, the additional observations of the system by

00:07:56 --> 00:07:59 Webb in February and April this year didn't reveal any

00:07:59 --> 00:08:02 objects like the one initially identified back in August

00:08:02 --> 00:08:05 last year. So to work out what was likely

00:08:05 --> 00:08:07 happening, the authors turned to computer models to

00:08:07 --> 00:08:10 simulate millions of potential orbits. And these

00:08:10 --> 00:08:13 simulations included both the new Webb data and

00:08:13 --> 00:08:15 Also an earlier 2019 potential

00:08:15 --> 00:08:18 exoplanetary candidate sighting by the European

00:08:18 --> 00:08:21 Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope in Chile.

00:08:22 --> 00:08:25 And they also considered orbits that would be gravitationally stable

00:08:25 --> 00:08:28 in the presence of Alpha Centauri B, meaning the

00:08:28 --> 00:08:30 planet wouldn't be getting flung out of the system. The

00:08:30 --> 00:08:33 authors say, a non detection in the second and third round of

00:08:33 --> 00:08:36 observations using Webb wasn't surprising. The

00:08:36 --> 00:08:39 models showed that the planet simply would have moved too close to the

00:08:39 --> 00:08:41 star to be visible during both the February and April

00:08:41 --> 00:08:44 observations. Now, if confirmed, the

00:08:44 --> 00:08:46 potential planet could mark a new milestone for

00:08:46 --> 00:08:49 exoplanetary imaging efforts. In fact, of all the

00:08:49 --> 00:08:52 directly imaged planets seen so far, this would be the

00:08:52 --> 00:08:55 closest to its star. It's also the most

00:08:55 --> 00:08:58 similar in terms of temperature and age to the gas giants

00:08:58 --> 00:09:01 in our own solar system and the nearest to Earth.

00:09:02 --> 00:09:04 But its very existence in a system of two

00:09:04 --> 00:09:07 closely separated stars challenges our

00:09:07 --> 00:09:10 understanding of how planets form and how they could

00:09:10 --> 00:09:12 survive and evolve in such a chaotic environment.

00:09:13 --> 00:09:16 If confirmed by additional observations, the results could

00:09:16 --> 00:09:19 transform the future of exoplanetary science,

00:09:19 --> 00:09:22 Beckman says. It would become a touchstone object.

00:09:22 --> 00:09:25 For example, NASA's Nancy Grace Roman Space

00:09:25 --> 00:09:28 Telescope, which is set to launch in May 2027, is

00:09:28 --> 00:09:31 equipped with dedicated hardware that's specifically designed

00:09:31 --> 00:09:34 to test new technologies to observe bina systems like

00:09:34 --> 00:09:36 Alpha Centauri in the search for other

00:09:36 --> 00:09:39 worlds. This is space time

00:09:40 --> 00:09:43 still to come. Growing concern among astronomers about the

00:09:43 --> 00:09:45 worsening proliferation of satellites in Earth orbit.

00:09:45 --> 00:09:48 And later in the Science report, early stage

00:09:48 --> 00:09:51 trials have shown positive results for a

00:09:51 --> 00:09:54 vaccine specifically designed to recognize and kill

00:09:54 --> 00:09:57 cancer cells. All that and more still to come

00:09:57 --> 00:09:58 on space time.

00:10:04 --> 00:10:04 Tim Mendham: Foreign.

00:10:14 --> 00:10:17 Stuart Gary: Astronomers have again raised concerns about the

00:10:17 --> 00:10:20 interference broadband Internet satellites are causing the

00:10:20 --> 00:10:22 vital scientific research. The latest

00:10:22 --> 00:10:25 warnings are focused on radio emissions being generated by

00:10:25 --> 00:10:28 Starlink and other broadband satellites, which are

00:10:28 --> 00:10:30 interfering with radio astronomy observations.

00:10:31 --> 00:10:34 A study led by Dylan Gregg from Curtin University

00:10:34 --> 00:10:36 Note of the International center for Radio Astronomy Research

00:10:37 --> 00:10:39 specifically looked at the effect of the Starlink

00:10:39 --> 00:10:42 megaconstellation, which now has more than 7

00:10:42 --> 00:10:45 satellites in orbit. Gregg says Starlink

00:10:45 --> 00:10:48 is the most immediate and frequent source of potential

00:10:48 --> 00:10:51 interference for radio astronomy. IT launched

00:10:51 --> 00:10:53 some 477 satellites alone during the

00:10:53 --> 00:10:56 study's four month data collection period.

00:10:57 --> 00:11:00 The problem is unintended signals coming from the

00:11:00 --> 00:11:03 satellites. The signals are being leaked by

00:11:03 --> 00:11:05 onboard electronics, and they drown out the faint

00:11:05 --> 00:11:08 radio waves astronomers are trying to study from the

00:11:08 --> 00:11:11 universe. Greg and colleagues collected and

00:11:11 --> 00:11:13 analyzed some 76 million images of the

00:11:13 --> 00:11:16 sky using a prototype of the Square Kilometer

00:11:16 --> 00:11:19 Array, which when complete, will be the world's largest and most

00:11:19 --> 00:11:22 sensitive radio telescope. They detected

00:11:22 --> 00:11:25 more than 112 radio emissions coming from

00:11:25 --> 00:11:27 1 Starlink satellites.

00:11:28 --> 00:11:31 That makes it the most comprehensive catalogue of satellite

00:11:31 --> 00:11:34 radio missions at low frequencies ever undertaken.

00:11:34 --> 00:11:37 They found that Starlink satellites, uh, are causing significant

00:11:37 --> 00:11:40 radio Pollution by interfering with radio astronomy

00:11:40 --> 00:11:43 observations, potentially impacting important

00:11:43 --> 00:11:46 discoveries and research. The study

00:11:46 --> 00:11:49 reported in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics found that

00:11:49 --> 00:11:51 some data sets had up to 30% of images

00:11:52 --> 00:11:54 showing interference from a Starlink satellite.

00:11:55 --> 00:11:58 Now, these latest warnings follow ongoing similar

00:11:58 --> 00:12:01 concerns raised by optical astronomers who have had to deal

00:12:01 --> 00:12:03 with trains of Starlink satellites blocking out their

00:12:03 --> 00:12:06 observations of the night skies. Griggs

00:12:06 --> 00:12:09 says the issue isn't just the number of satellites up there, but

00:12:09 --> 00:12:12 the strength of their radio signals and the frequencies they were

00:12:12 --> 00:12:15 visible at. Some of the satellites were being detected

00:12:15 --> 00:12:17 emitting in radio bands where no signals are supposed to

00:12:17 --> 00:12:20 be present at all. And that included some 703

00:12:20 --> 00:12:23 satellites identified at 150.8

00:12:23 --> 00:12:26 MHz, which is meant to be a, uh, protected fre

00:12:26 --> 00:12:29 for radio astronomy. Greg says because they come

00:12:29 --> 00:12:32 from components on the satellites like electronics, they're

00:12:32 --> 00:12:35 not part of any intentional signal and astronomers

00:12:35 --> 00:12:38 can't easily predict them or filter them out.

00:12:38 --> 00:12:40 Alex Zaharov-Reutt: We wanted to find out what the prevalence of

00:12:40 --> 00:12:43 satellites were at the frequencies that the SKA

00:12:43 --> 00:12:46 Low is going to be looking over, because similar studies

00:12:46 --> 00:12:49 with other telescopes around the world had seen satellite

00:12:49 --> 00:12:52 in images and data are, ah, created of the

00:12:52 --> 00:12:55 sky. So, yeah, we, um, designed a

00:12:55 --> 00:12:57 survey using telescope called

00:12:58 --> 00:13:01 Engineering Development Array 2. It's pretty much

00:13:01 --> 00:13:03 the same size as a SKA Low

00:13:03 --> 00:13:06 station. And yeah, so we found a lot of satellites

00:13:06 --> 00:13:09 in the images that we created, most of them being

00:13:09 --> 00:13:12 Starlink satellites. And so the way we looked

00:13:12 --> 00:13:15 at the sky was we took images of the

00:13:15 --> 00:13:18 sky in radio every two seconds, uh,

00:13:18 --> 00:13:21 for about a month. And yeah, so that's how we searched

00:13:21 --> 00:13:22 for the satellites.

00:13:22 --> 00:13:24 Stuart Gary: Something like 30% of the images showed

00:13:24 --> 00:13:27 interference from Starlink satellites.

00:13:27 --> 00:13:30 Alex Zaharov-Reutt: Uh, yeah, in some of the frequencies that we looked at,

00:13:30 --> 00:13:33 we saw a lot of Starlink satellites in the images.

00:13:33 --> 00:13:36 And it kind of makes sense because if we see one or two of

00:13:36 --> 00:13:38 them, most of them are designed pretty

00:13:38 --> 00:13:41 similarly. And the launch of

00:13:41 --> 00:13:43 Starlink satellites has been almost

00:13:43 --> 00:13:46 exponential. So yeah, it kind of makes sense that we see so

00:13:46 --> 00:13:47 many of them in the images.

00:13:47 --> 00:13:50 Stuart Gary: Can you filter them out of the data to save the research,

00:13:50 --> 00:13:53 or is this just an interference we now have to deal with?

00:13:53 --> 00:13:56 Alex Zaharov-Reutt: They're quite bright, so they're roughly

00:13:56 --> 00:13:59 sometimes the same brightness as like

00:13:59 --> 00:14:01 the brightest radio galaxy that we see in the,

00:14:02 --> 00:14:04 um. And when they're so bright compared

00:14:05 --> 00:14:08 to really faint signals from the early

00:14:08 --> 00:14:10 universe, which is what radio astronomers are looking for,

00:14:10 --> 00:14:13 it makes them quite difficult to filter out. But a lot of

00:14:13 --> 00:14:16 the time, the current mitigation strategy is just to

00:14:16 --> 00:14:19 get rid of data when they're visible, or

00:14:19 --> 00:14:22 be smarter in how the surveys are

00:14:22 --> 00:14:25 required so that, uh, you're looking at the sky with the

00:14:25 --> 00:14:27 telescope when the satellites aren't directly overhead.

00:14:27 --> 00:14:30 Stuart Gary: But that's one of the big problems, isn't it? Because they're everywhere now.

00:14:30 --> 00:14:33 You've got potentially 35 of them. This

00:14:33 --> 00:14:36 is Starlink alone, potentially 35 of

00:14:36 --> 00:14:39 them about to be launched. Already. You've got what,

00:14:39 --> 00:14:42 over 7 at the time of recording

00:14:42 --> 00:14:43 this program, correct?

00:14:43 --> 00:14:45 Alex Zaharov-Reutt: Yeah. So, uh, yeah, there's going to be.

00:14:45 --> 00:14:46 Tim Mendham: A lot more launch.

00:14:46 --> 00:14:49 Alex Zaharov-Reutt: So we've had dialogue with SpaceX,

00:14:49 --> 00:14:51 which is the company that operates these

00:14:51 --> 00:14:54 satellites. So we're hoping that, yeah, further

00:14:54 --> 00:14:56 discussion with them will help with

00:14:56 --> 00:14:59 introducing mitigations for future

00:14:59 --> 00:15:02 satellites that they launch. Because, yeah, there's going to be

00:15:02 --> 00:15:03 a lot more in the future.

00:15:03 --> 00:15:06 Stuart Gary: And this isn't a problem which is new, because when

00:15:06 --> 00:15:09 Starlink first began launching, optical

00:15:09 --> 00:15:12 astronomers began seeing them in their images, and

00:15:12 --> 00:15:15 they began seeing entire trains of these satellites and

00:15:15 --> 00:15:17 more and more of them. And it's affecting research

00:15:18 --> 00:15:21 for optical astronomy to a huge degree. And even

00:15:21 --> 00:15:24 then, this is five years ago, there are already warnings

00:15:24 --> 00:15:27 that the same thing would happen in radio astronomy. And that's exactly what

00:15:27 --> 00:15:27 we're seeing.

00:15:27 --> 00:15:30 Alex Zaharov-Reutt: Yeah. So, um, in optical, SpaceX

00:15:30 --> 00:15:33 has made some good mitigations for the satellites.

00:15:33 --> 00:15:36 Like they made some changes, like pa. The satellite.

00:15:36 --> 00:15:39 Stuart Gary: They're stealth satellites, they're calling them, but they're making some

00:15:39 --> 00:15:41 changes. But they're still coming up in images.

00:15:41 --> 00:15:44 Alex Zaharov-Reutt: Oh, for sure, for sure. Yeah. But at least there has been

00:15:44 --> 00:15:46 some progress towards mitigating it. And we're

00:15:46 --> 00:15:49 hoping that some similar mitigations could be made

00:15:49 --> 00:15:52 for the radio data as well. But, yeah, with

00:15:52 --> 00:15:55 the sheer volume of satellites up there, and especially in

00:15:55 --> 00:15:58 optical, it's reflection of sunlight, so

00:15:58 --> 00:16:01 it's a little bit of a different transmission problem.

00:16:01 --> 00:16:04 Um, but yeah, with the sheer volume of them being up there,

00:16:04 --> 00:16:05 you're going to see a lot of them.

00:16:05 --> 00:16:08 Stuart Gary: I know we've been Starlink for this, but of course, it's

00:16:08 --> 00:16:11 not just StarLink. We've got GlobeStar up there as well.

00:16:11 --> 00:16:14 They've got thousands of satellites either in space or on

00:16:14 --> 00:16:17 their way there. Iridium is still there and they've been around

00:16:17 --> 00:16:20 for years now. And you've also got Kuiper

00:16:20 --> 00:16:23 Systems, Inmarsat. There are so many of them up there, and the problem's

00:16:23 --> 00:16:26 not going to go away. This is something, unfortunately, we're going

00:16:26 --> 00:16:26 to have to live with.

00:16:26 --> 00:16:29 Alex Zaharov-Reutt: Yes, the number of satellites being launched into space is

00:16:29 --> 00:16:32 going to keep increasing, at least for the near future. So

00:16:32 --> 00:16:35 it's pretty important that continuing surveys

00:16:35 --> 00:16:38 are done to see if the prevalence of satellites in the

00:16:38 --> 00:16:41 IM of astronomy gets worse.

00:16:41 --> 00:16:44 And if it does, it's probably going to come down to having

00:16:44 --> 00:16:46 conversations with the individual operators

00:16:46 --> 00:16:49 and hoping like so the, the emission from

00:16:49 --> 00:16:52 the Starlink satellites that we detected was

00:16:53 --> 00:16:56 outside of their designated downlink frequency.

00:16:56 --> 00:16:59 And so it's emission coming from somewhere on board

00:16:59 --> 00:17:01 the satellites electronics.

00:17:01 --> 00:17:04 And so it's kind of a gray area of regulation

00:17:04 --> 00:17:06 at the moment. So it's, there's no one

00:17:07 --> 00:17:09 regulating that. So we're having

00:17:09 --> 00:17:12 continued conversations about getting this kind of stuff

00:17:12 --> 00:17:15 regulated in the future, which would help

00:17:15 --> 00:17:15 astronomy.

00:17:15 --> 00:17:18 Stuart Gary: It's only by government mandated regulations that

00:17:18 --> 00:17:21 these things tend to change. Otherwise companies who are out there to

00:17:21 --> 00:17:24 make a profit, well, they're going to drag their feet.

00:17:24 --> 00:17:26 Alex Zaharov-Reutt: There's uh, an organization called the International

00:17:26 --> 00:17:28 Telecommunications Union and so they

00:17:28 --> 00:17:31 regulate a lot of the radio emissions for these

00:17:31 --> 00:17:34 satellites for the intentional transmissions and

00:17:34 --> 00:17:37 they do most of the radio spectrum

00:17:37 --> 00:17:40 terrestrial transmission on Earth as well. So it would be an

00:17:40 --> 00:17:43 organization like that which would probably

00:17:43 --> 00:17:46 be in the best position to regulate

00:17:46 --> 00:17:48 something like this. And ultimately they're having those

00:17:48 --> 00:17:51 discussions to hopefully regulate it in the future.

00:17:51 --> 00:17:54 So it'll probably come down to an organization that

00:17:54 --> 00:17:57 represents a lot of different countries rather

00:17:57 --> 00:17:59 than one country, like federal government.

00:18:00 --> 00:18:03 That's a, that's the side of regulation of policy

00:18:03 --> 00:18:06 and stuff which my work didn't focus on at all.

00:18:06 --> 00:18:08 Stuart Gary: That's where the politics comes into it all, I guess.

00:18:08 --> 00:18:08 Tim Mendham: Correct?

00:18:08 --> 00:18:11 Stuart Gary: Yes, that's Dylan Gregg from the Curtin University

00:18:11 --> 00:18:14 node of the International center for Radio Astronomy

00:18:14 --> 00:18:17 Research. And this is space, time

00:18:33 --> 00:18:36 and time there to take a brief look at some of the other stories maybe making

00:18:36 --> 00:18:39 news in science this week with the Science Report.

00:18:40 --> 00:18:43 Early stage trials in 25 patients have

00:18:43 --> 00:18:45 shown that a vaccine designed to stimulate a type of

00:18:45 --> 00:18:48 immune T cell to recognize and kill cancer cells

00:18:48 --> 00:18:51 is showing positive results. The

00:18:51 --> 00:18:54 findings reported in the journal Nature Medicine could help

00:18:54 --> 00:18:57 prolong long term recurrence free survival in

00:18:57 --> 00:18:59 some cancer patients. The vaccine is

00:18:59 --> 00:19:02 not personalized to people's individual tumors,

00:19:02 --> 00:19:05 but instead trains the immune system to attack

00:19:05 --> 00:19:07 a specific type of cell carrying a prot

00:19:08 --> 00:19:11 Kras, which is often mutated in people with specific

00:19:11 --> 00:19:14 cancers. The study found that after around

00:19:14 --> 00:19:16 20 months, 68% of participants had

00:19:16 --> 00:19:19 developed strong T cell responses specific to

00:19:19 --> 00:19:22 these mutant Kras tumour proteins.

00:19:22 --> 00:19:25 The patients with the strongest T cell responses also

00:19:25 --> 00:19:28 lived longer and stayed cancer free for longer than

00:19:28 --> 00:19:30 those with weaker responses.

00:19:31 --> 00:19:34 A new study has shown that While being stuck at home

00:19:34 --> 00:19:37 during the COVID 19 pandemic, more parents

00:19:37 --> 00:19:40 were thinking about, shall we say, playing an away

00:19:40 --> 00:19:42 game compared to non parents. A

00:19:42 --> 00:19:45 report in the journal PLOS ONE found that a survey

00:19:45 --> 00:19:48 of 1American adults showed that parents

00:19:48 --> 00:19:51 were more likely than non parents to cheat on their partners

00:19:51 --> 00:19:54 during the pandemic. In fact, the authors found

00:19:54 --> 00:19:57 that parents were both more likely to think about cheating as

00:19:57 --> 00:19:59 well as actually having an affair, with

00:19:59 --> 00:20:01 20.7% of parents engaging in

00:20:01 --> 00:20:04 infidelity compared to just 13.9% of

00:20:04 --> 00:20:07 non parents. They also found that males were more

00:20:07 --> 00:20:10 likely to cheat and think about cheating compared to females,

00:20:10 --> 00:20:13 although among the parents, both mothers and fathers

00:20:13 --> 00:20:16 showed similar patterns. The

00:20:16 --> 00:20:19 Australian Navy signed a contract to purchase 11

00:20:19 --> 00:20:22 Japanese designed upgraded Mogami Class

00:20:22 --> 00:20:24 FMM guided missile frigates.

00:20:25 --> 00:20:27 Developed by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. The

00:20:27 --> 00:20:30 4880 ton warships will be equipped

00:20:30 --> 00:20:33 with 32 vertical launch cells capable of

00:20:33 --> 00:20:35 firing long range Tomahawk cruise missiles.

00:20:36 --> 00:20:39 The new 10 billion dollar fleet will replace the aging

00:20:39 --> 00:20:42 ANZAC class frigates and will work closely with

00:20:42 --> 00:20:44 Canberra's Aegis class destroyers. The

00:20:44 --> 00:20:47 first three frigates will be built in Japan with shipbuilding yards

00:20:47 --> 00:20:50 in Western Australia expected to produce the remainder.

00:20:51 --> 00:20:54 The first of these new so called stealth frigates should be in

00:20:54 --> 00:20:56 the water by 2030. In

00:20:56 --> 00:20:58 2021, Australia announced a deal to

00:20:58 --> 00:21:01 acquire at least three American Virginia class nuclear

00:21:01 --> 00:21:04 submarines with a further five SSN Aukus

00:21:04 --> 00:21:07 nuclear submarines be built in South Australia under an

00:21:07 --> 00:21:09 agreement with the British Royal Navy. The

00:21:09 --> 00:21:12 SSN Aukus subs will use a combination

00:21:12 --> 00:21:14 of Australian, British and American

00:21:15 --> 00:21:15 technologies.

00:21:17 --> 00:21:20 Well, despite all the scientific advances in

00:21:20 --> 00:21:22 medicine, there are still millions of people who practice

00:21:22 --> 00:21:25 worthless traditional Chinese medicine pseudoscience

00:21:25 --> 00:21:28 to make up for their, shall we say, lack of manliness.

00:21:29 --> 00:21:31 The result is the slaughter or cruel

00:21:31 --> 00:21:34 captivity of thousands of innocent animals,

00:21:34 --> 00:21:36 including many rare and endangered species.

00:21:36 --> 00:21:39 Tim Mendham from Australian Skeptics says the science

00:21:39 --> 00:21:42 proves it simply doesn't work. But men with

00:21:42 --> 00:21:45 teeny weeny attributes simply don't

00:21:45 --> 00:21:45 care.

00:21:45 --> 00:21:48 Tim Mendham: The animals that they use and abuse, quite frankly

00:21:48 --> 00:21:51 with this medicine, things for tiny treatments, quite frankly

00:21:51 --> 00:21:54 that uh, that don't work. Rhino horn of course

00:21:54 --> 00:21:57 being used as an aphrodisiac during impotency issues.

00:21:57 --> 00:22:00 Stuart Gary: I thought that was only something that people with small worried

00:22:00 --> 00:22:00 about.

00:22:01 --> 00:22:03 Tim Mendham: I haven't checked but it could be

00:22:03 --> 00:22:06 tigers, bears, the bile from

00:22:06 --> 00:22:09 bears, pangolins of course with the scales or

00:22:09 --> 00:22:12 whatever. Well, musk, it's a terrible situation that is

00:22:12 --> 00:22:15 actually uh, wiping out animals. Seahorses are

00:22:15 --> 00:22:18 being sort of wiped out by um, this traditional

00:22:18 --> 00:22:21 Chinese medicine for cures that are Totally. Just because it's

00:22:21 --> 00:22:23 traditional doesn't mean it works. It just makes it sound good. It's

00:22:23 --> 00:22:26 unfortunate. That prime effect of traditional Chinese

00:22:26 --> 00:22:29 medicine when it uses these animal products is that

00:22:29 --> 00:22:32 they just ruthlessly pay money for animals which are

00:22:32 --> 00:22:34 just torn out of their natural environments,

00:22:35 --> 00:22:37 killed for a very small bit of it if they're not farmed

00:22:37 --> 00:22:40 like a lot of the bears are. Ah, for, uh, farming the bile

00:22:40 --> 00:22:43 ducks and have a little tube stuck in the river moor and they're kept in

00:22:43 --> 00:22:46 awful conditions. It's a real problem and it still exists. The rhino

00:22:46 --> 00:22:49 hood, the tigers are sort of have been banned, the tiger

00:22:49 --> 00:22:52 bones to be used in China, but there's still people there using it. And

00:22:52 --> 00:22:55 actually a lot of them, uh, a lot of overseas Chinese

00:22:55 --> 00:22:58 practitioners not in China, uh, are using tiger

00:22:58 --> 00:23:00 bones as well. And you think these are animals being depleted from the

00:23:00 --> 00:23:03 natural environment? These are endangered species if not

00:23:03 --> 00:23:06 wiped out entirely for one small part of their body.

00:23:06 --> 00:23:09 And, uh, it's a real concern from a natural environment

00:23:09 --> 00:23:12 point of view. It definitely is a concern and certainly also from a

00:23:12 --> 00:23:15 medical point of view because they don't actually do anything. It's a false

00:23:15 --> 00:23:18 treatment with a major problem associated with it.

00:23:18 --> 00:23:20 Stuart Gary: That's Tim Mendham from Australian Skeptics.

00:23:36 --> 00:23:39 And that's the show for now. Space Time is

00:23:39 --> 00:23:42 available every Monday, Wednesday and Friday through Apple

00:23:42 --> 00:23:44 Podcasts, itunes, Stitcher, Google

00:23:44 --> 00:23:47 Podcast, Pocketcasts, Spotify,

00:23:47 --> 00:23:49 Acast, Amazon Music,

00:23:49 --> 00:23:52 bytes.com, soundcloud, YouTube Music,

00:23:52 --> 00:23:55 your favorite podcast download provider, and from

00:23:55 --> 00:23:57 spacetime with stewardgarry.com

00:23:57 --> 00:24:00 Space Times also broadcasts through the National Science

00:24:00 --> 00:24:03 foundation on Science Zone Radio and on both

00:24:03 --> 00:24:06 iHeartradio and TuneIn radio. And

00:24:06 --> 00:24:09 you can help to support our show by visiting the SpaceTime

00:24:09 --> 00:24:12 Store for a range of promotional merchandising goodies

00:24:12 --> 00:24:15 or by becoming a SpaceTime patron, which gives you

00:24:15 --> 00:24:18 access to triple episode commercial free versions of the

00:24:18 --> 00:24:21 show, as well as lots of bonus audio content. Which doesn't

00:24:21 --> 00:24:23 go to where access to our exclusive Facebook book group

00:24:23 --> 00:24:26 and other rewards. Just go to

00:24:26 --> 00:24:28 spacetimewithstuartgarry.com for full

00:24:28 --> 00:24:31 details. Uh, you've been listening to

00:24:31 --> 00:24:33 SpaceTime with Stuart Gary Gary. This has been

00:24:33 --> 00:24:36 another quality podcast production from Bytes.

00:24:36 --> 00:24:37 Com.